SEC Asks for Congressional Authority to Seek Civil Penalties for Investment Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is hoping Congress will increase its authority to seek civil penalties for investment fraud.

The Agency's Director of Enforcement, Robert Khuzami, testified before the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Securities and said the SEC would like to have increased authority to impose penalties on those who help defendants in violation of the Investment Advisers Act. Khuzami also told the Senate the agency needs the authority to subpoena people in civil cases across the country. This would save the agency travel expenses as well as staff resources, because duplicate depositions would be avoided.  Khuzami also pointed out several areas in the enforcement division that need more resources. The agency would benefit, he said, from hiring more trial lawyers, as well as chief operating officers to manage the division.  He also asked for more resources in the form of enhanced paralegal and administrative support, as well as better technological resources. 

Khuzami spoke to the panel in response to a report by the Government Accountability Office, which made suggestions for enhancements in SEC operations. The report analyzed agency operations and found there was a delay in cases and lowered settlement amounts in investment fraud cases, because of outdated penalty policies.  Under one of these policies agency enforcement staff was forced to obtain approval on a settlement before discussing penalties with public companies. That policy was revoked by SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro.

The agency has also suffered from a shortage of staffing and resources, resulting in a backlog of cases. Since the Bernard Madoff investment fraud was exposed last year, the SEC has come under increased pressure to enhance its operations. The appointment of Khuzami was one of the first moves Schapiro made to strengthen the division.

Attempts at SEC Improvement

Last month we discussed other moves that could strengthen the SEC and fine tune its ability to crack down on investment fraud much faster. These include the proposed formation of specialized teams to deal with specific frauds. The SEC is also proposing increased cooperation with criminal authorities and enhancing the management model currently in place at the agency. 

It may be a while before these proposed measures actually move toward becoming implemented at the agency, but securities attorneys, who have been critical of the agency's failures to crack down on investment fraud, believe any enhancements are worth the wait.

 

 

 

California Investment Fraud Masterminds Guidi and Armitage Arrested

Investors in Sonoma County are relieved at the arrest of Gary Armitage and Jeff Guidi for securities fraud.

The two were recently arrested and have been charged with multiple counts of securities fraud and residential burglary. The residential burglary charges relate to the fact that the two entered people's homes while selling their schemes. Armitage and Guidi ran AGA Financial, an investment company in Santa Rosa. Their Ponzi scheme swindled an estimated $200 million from thousands of people before it fell apart. The duo's business partner, James Koenig, was also arrested on similar charges. If they are convicted, the three could each spend 100 years in prison.

Ponzi SchemeAccording to Attorney General Jerry Brown, the three used investor money to bankroll their lavish lifestyle, including luxury residences, expensive cars, and a Lear jet. Most of the investors were retirees who Armitage and Guidi coaxed into investing their life savings.

According to the AG's office, the three men established a network of 55 businesses to keep their Ponzi scheme going. In 1997, the three began selling real estate projects, promising investors they were secure low risk investments with returns of 12 percent or more. Investment planning seminars were held across the state,and investors handed over sums ranging from between $50,000 and $1 million. Some people actually invested their entire savings accounts funds and retirement portfolios.

In 2001, the three redirected investor funds into purchasing more than 20 senior care facilities. Each of them were sold to one of the affiliate companies, which would then sell shares in the property at a high price to new investors. Another affiliate company in the network would manage the property to increase revenues. Any revenues were used to pay interest to investors and keep the scheme afloat. The scheme began to unravel when the defendants could not keep up with interest payments to investors. That did not stop Armitage and Koenig from seeking investors, however. They continued to attract new investors using new investment funds to pay off earlier investors who were beginning to get worried.

With frauds tumbling out of the closet at an alarming rate, it looks like securities attorneys will be busy for a while to come.

 

 

 

Amarillo, Texas Businessman Charged with Securities Fraud

A businessman in Amarillo, Texas has been arrested for investment fraud involving $1 million and at least 100 people.

Last week, Amarillo police arrested John Langford of Langford and Associates on nine felony charges. He faces charges of securities fraud and selling unregistered securities. John Langford - Securities FraudHe is being held at the Potter county jail on a $500,000 bond for each charge.

According to reports, Langford promised high rates of return to new investors. He then used new investor funds to pay off earlier investors. According to the district attorney, John Langford probably does not own sufficient assets to cover the amount he has defrauded. Anxious investors have been contacting the DA, worried about their investments.  So far, Sims says, the number of investors seems to be more than 100 people, and these numbers are expected to increase as the investigation progresses.

We are still waiting to hear more details from the DA’s office but to securities attorneys, this much is clear:

  • Langford seems to have operated a Ponzi scheme.
  • A number of elderly people appear to have been included as victims. Sims has confirmed that many of the victims are senior citizens who purchased annuities, but received no benefits when Langford defaulted.

Langford is facing a total of nine felonies:

  • One second degree charge of fraudulent sales of securities
  • One third degree felony charge of selling securities without being a registered dealer
  • Three third degree charges of selling unregistered securities in Texas
  • Four first degree felony charges of fraudulent sales of securities

Seucrities and Exchange CommisionAccording to Sims, his office worked together with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for about two weeks before moving in. Sims is asking investors who purchased annuities from Langford to contact the DA's office.

Hopefully the SEC's proposed plans to crack down on securities fraud with specialized groups will come to light and operate succesfully. Too many ponzi schemers and investment fraudsters are still on the loose, taking advantage of naive investors.

 

 

 

Ex Dallas Cowboys Player Sued by SEC for Investment Fraud

A former Dallas Cowboys player is being sued by the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) for misleading clients about investments.  

Mike Kiselak played for the Dallas Cowboys between 1998 and 1999.  According to reports, Kiselak falsely claimed that his Westlake investment fund generated two percent monthly profits by trading treasury bills. Fraudulent Venture Capital Investment - VineyardKiselak allegedly entrusted the funds to a California-based Venture capital firm, Gemstar Capital Group Inc. The firm and its president, Jeffrey Sykes, have also been named in the SEC suit.

Investors were mostly friends and family members and rather than going into treasury bills, much of the funds went to venture capital investments, including a vineyard. When Kiselak asked for accounts statements, Gemstar provided a false statement that showed about $7 million missing from the funds. According to the SEC suit, Kiselak also failed to disclose to investors that he would charge a 35 percent performance fee. In April this year, he charged investors a performance fee based on Gemstar's supposed 9.6 percent gains during the first quarter of 2009.

Investment Fraud

Investment planners and advisors are required to disclose to investors the risks of their investments. These securities professionals must also make suitable recommendations appropriate for the needs and objectives of the investor.

Failure to disclose is one offense that has been highly visible in recent months. Several investment fraud cases have been linked, in part at least, to the planner's failure to properly present investment techniques and methods to investors. From sub-prime mortgage backed securities schemes that have left thousands of investors with billions dollars losses, to smaller frauds like the one operated by Kiselak, investors have been at the receiving end of the recklessness and greed of their investment planners.

Democratic Fundraiser Pleads Guilty to Investment Fraud Charges

A former fundraiser for the Democratic Party pled guilty to running an investment fraud scheme. Norman Hsu operated a Ponzi scheme in which he used new investor money to make payments to older investors.

Hsu has been charged with falsely representing to investors that their investments were being used to extend short term loans to companies. He operated the fraud between 1997 and 2007, and lured investors to part with at least $60 million in all. He pled guilty to five counts each of mail fraud and wire fraud. In his own words he knew what he was doing “was illegal”.

Illegal Political DonationsAccording to authorities, the investment fraud affected investors across the country. Next week, Hsu faces another trial for campaign finance fraud. According to prosecutors, his contributions to politicians allowed him access into influential political circles, and he used these connections to impress potential investors. At least one of his fraud victims is due to testify that Hsu played a voice mail message by a political candidate to impress her into investing with him. Hsu is facing charges that he had “straw donors“ contribute to federal candidates. These donors were then reimbursed.

Straw Donations

Making "straw donations" or fake donations by people who do not exist is a violation of federal law. Hillary Clinton’s run for the White House last year was mired in allegations that the campaign was heavily funded by straw donors, several of who made a living as cooks and dishwashers, but were apparently able to cough up $1,000 donations. The straw donors in that case either had bogus addresses or, considering their profession, were unlikely to have donated those amounts. The campaign finance charges Hsu faces allege that he reimbursed straw donors who contributed $25,000 a year to political campaigns.

Investment Fraud Prevention

While that trial is yet to begin, it is not surprising that Hsu made use of his political connections to lure investors. Like the Alabama pastor we recently reported on, Stanford COO Jim Davis who founded a church, and Shawn Merriman who was not averse to soliciting investments from members of the Church of Jesus Christ and Latter Day Saints, fraudsters frequently use respectability and religion to bolster investor confidence. That is not to say that you should look at every investment planner who wears a nice suit and goes to church with suspicious eyes, but you must keep these investment fraud prevention tips in mind. Research, monitor, and exercise caution throughout the investment process. Security attorneys will tell you it is highly likely there are many more investment frauds still going on and investors must be vigilant.

 

 

 

Alabama Pastor and Attorney Are Arrested for Securities Fraud

A pastor in Jefferson County and an attorney from Trussville, Alabama have been arrested for investment fraud – they were cheating investors by selling phony securities.

According to the Alabama Securities Commission, Pastor Randall Layne Pardue and attorney Cary Allen Burdette were booked and indicted for conducting securities business without a proper license. Both have been accused of cheating investors in fraud schemes. Burdette has been charged with 13 counts of fraud in connection with the sale of a security, and one count for each sale of security by an unregistered agent. Securities FraudPardue, the pastor of an unidentified Birmingham area church, is being charged with seven counts of fraud in connection with the sale of a security, and one count for each sale of an unregistered security.

Pardue convinced at least half a dozen members of his church to invest in his scheme. He reportedly told some of his investors he would be investing their money in a gulf shores condo project. Burdette was also a member of the church.

There are few details about the fraud, but one fact is: gullible investors are more likely to trust their money to people who seem like upstanding members of their community - church going, reputed people. The stereotype of the oily haired salesman is yesterday’s investment fraud news. Today’s fraudster knows that a carefully cultivated image of respectability nets investors faster than any group presentations or brochures could.

 

 

 

Texas Businessman Ordered to pay $71 Million to Ponzi Scheme Victims

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ordered businessman George Hudgins to pay $71 million to victims of his Ponzi scheme investment fraud.

The business man was ordered to pay $15 million in civil penalties and was bared from the commodity industry.  From June 2001 to May 2008, Hudgins solicited people to invest about $88 million in a commodity pool that was purported to engage in commodity futures training. Investors were lured through group presentations, newsletters, and personal meetings from December 2003.

From the time the commodity pool was set up until April 30, 2008, the pool netted total losses of more than $8 million. The pool made a net loss each year, but Hudgins told investors the company, between 2000 and 2007, made net annual profits from 22.5 to 95 percent.

Ponzi Scheme - Assets SeizedTo placate investors, Hudgins sent them false account statements, reflecting profits. He reportedly paid older investors approximately $17 million from money solicited from newer investors in his scheme. According to court records, the remainder of the money was used for lavish personal expenses, including an antique sports car collection, jewelry, and an airplane.

In May 2008, a judge, on the request of the Commodity Futures Training Commission, froze all Hudgins’ assets and anxious investors began to consult securities attorneys.  A court-appointed receiver was able to recover approximately $24 million through the sale of assets and return of false profits that some investors had received. In March, the funds were distributed to some of the investors.

In September 2008, Hudgins pled guilty to wire fraud, money laundering, and was sentenced to 120 months in federal prison. Hudgins’ Ponzi scheme was one of the first in a series that has rocked the financial world. Since then, Ponzi schemes have continued to turn up at an alarming rate. In 2009 alone, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has brought enforcement action in at least 24 such schemes.

 

 

 

Georgia Lawyer Pleads Guilty to Ponzi Investment Fraud

An attorney in Marietta, Georgia was allegedly soliciting more than just elder abuse cases – he has been charged with luring investors and operating a Ponzi scheme worth $40 million.

Last week, Robert P. Copeland pled guilty to a single count of wire fraud. Copeland solicited investments through elder law and estate planning seminars arranged by his law firm. He recruited unsuspecting elderly clients from Georgia, Florida, Missouri, Texas, and South Carolina. He worked with six investment planners who were paid commissions for referring victims to him.

Georgia Ponzi SchemeAccording to investigators, Copeland began soliciting investors about 10 years after he began practicing as an attorney. He promised investors that their funds would be used as short term loans for real estate investment. He told them that when he was able to sell the properties, he would be able to pay them returns as high as 15 to 18 percent. Copeland operated a firm called Advance Asset Strategies, assuring investors in his brochure that ”your loan is secured by the actual property that the real estate investor purchases”. 

It helped Copeland that he was a reputed, licensed attorney who regularly spoke at seminars and had co-authored a book on estate planning. He combined investors’ funds with money that flowed in from his law practice. Very little of this money actually found its way into real estate developments, and there were, therefore, no profits from the project. In the classic workings of a Ponzi investment fraud, Copeland began to recruit new investors furiously, using their money to pay off earlier investors.

Copeland's sentencing is set for July 10th. The Securities and Exchange Commission has ordered Copeland to repay stolen investor money. From senior citizens to Madoff’s duped charities, it seems no one was too weak or vulnerable for these Ponzi scheme fraudsters to prey on.

California Ponzi Inventment Fraud Targets Hispanics

In what has been called a Ponzi scheme with a twist, a California investment firm operated a $23 million fraud, specifically targeted at Latino investors.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against the El Segundo-based investment firm, Maximum Return Investments Inc., accusing the owner Clelia A. Flores of operating a Ponzi scheme. Flores solicited investments from 150 investors in New York, Georgia, California, Texas, Utah, Illinois, and Nevada between 2006 and 2008.  She promised investors she would invest the money in banking, real estate, and oil exploration; and offered returns of up to 25%. Instead, Flores simply took money from new investors and paid interest to older investors.

Ponzi Scheme LawyerAccording to the SEC lawsuit, as much as $3.5 million was spent on lavish personal expenses, including a down payment on a $1.9 million home. She also threw a grand party to celebrate the company’s "success" at the Ritz Carlton in Marina Del Ray, which unsuspecting investors paid for.  Of the $23 million, approximately $13 million was spent making interest payments to investors while more than $5 million was lost in speculative investments. There is no information yet on whether there is a criminal investigation into Flores' actions. The SEC lawsuit is seeking restitution and penalties.

Securities attorneys deal with Ponzi fraud schemes all the time, but this one is slightly unusual because it seems to have been specifically targeted at the Latino community. Flores used old fashioned and effective methods of attracting investors. Not only did she promise high returns, but she also offered a referral fee of 10% to clients who referred other clients to her.

Ponzi Scheme Attorney

A Ponzi scheme investment fraud can only succeed when the numbers of investors are limited and there is a free flow of funds. When the funds dry up or when the number of investors balloons out of control, and the fraudster does not have sufficient funds to pay off anxious investors, the scheme begins to disintegrate. The credit squeeze has unraveled a number of Ponzi schemes from Bernard Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi fraud to smaller frauds like the one Clelia Flores operated.

If you have lost money in a Ponzi scheme the experienced investment fraud attorneys at Arnold & Itkin LLP can help you recover your investments. Contact a securities attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP to discuss your case.

 

 

 

Colorado Investment Manager Charged in Ponzi Scheme

In the latest Ponzi scheme uncovered, a Colorado investment manager faces civil charges in connection with a $20 million investment fraud.

Shawn Merriman has been accused of operating a Ponzi scheme that defrauded at least 38 investors in Minnesota, Utah, and Colorado. The fraud is believed to have been conducted from 1994 to 2009, and is estimated to be worth $17 to $20 million. According to the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Merriman operated the fraud through his firm, Market Street Advisors. Securities AttorneyIn a classic investment fraud tactic, Merriman promised his investors returns of up to 20%, but lost approximately $400,000 from the initial funds. It was then that Merriman started another fund to pay investors in a Ponzi scheme operation. As the scale of the fraud grew, he added two more funds to pay withdrawals. He traded securities during the first year of his scam, but eventually stopped and focused completely on his scheme. The SEC asked that Merriman‘s assets be frozen and that he be ordered to pay his investors back with interest.

Merriman used some of the money for lavish personal expenses, including the purchase of Rembrandts, vehicles, sports memorabilia, and properties in Aurora and Idaho. His art collection includes more than 375 pieces that have been featured in the media. Some of his Rembrandts were displayed at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints properties in Denver in 2008. There were also motorcycles, a gun collection, and a boat.  All of these have been seized by U.S. Marshals.

Investigators are still trying to determine the scale of investor losses. They are also looking into the possibility that Merriman may have used his position in the Mormon Church to lure investors.  If that turns out to be true, Merriman would not be the first fraudster to use his church connections to sell his scheme. Stanford group employees were not averse to pitching their dubious certificates of deposit to members of their church.  According to securities fraud experts, it is a common ploy – people are less likely to suspect someone they see at Church every Sunday of operating a fraud.

Ponzi Scheme Fraud

In a Ponzi scheme investor funds are used to pay off earlier investors. The success of a Ponzi scheme depends, to a large extent, on word of mouth spread by early investors who, thrilled with the kind of returns they see, spread the word to other investors. In 2009 alone, the SEC has acted to halt more than 12 Ponzi schemes. With new Ponzi frauds surfacing every day, it looks like the SEC and securities attorneys will be busy for quite a while.

If you've lost money in a Ponzi scheme or other investor fraud, contact a securities attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP for a free evaluation of your claim.

 

 

 

SEC to Use Private Sector Help to Detect Investor Fraud

Under criticism for its failure to prevent the $65 billion Bernard Madoff investment fraud, among many others, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is looking at innovative ways to help uncover fraud.

The new chairman of the SEC, Mary Schapiro, said she is looking at new ways of enforcing anti-fraud laws, including the use of private sector agencies. The SEC currently relies on approximately 400 staff members to oversee more than 11,000 investment advisors. While increasing staff strength to cope with these huge demands is in the cards, the regulator concedes that it will also have to ‘’leverage third parties’’, like auditors, to help uncover scams.

Securities Fraud AttorneyThe SEC’s shortcomings were glaringly evident in the way Bernard Madoff managed to operate his Ponzi scheme for years, undetected. Once the extent of the scam came to light, it became clear that the SEC had not bothered to inspect Madoff's investment advisory arm since 2006, when the business was registered with the SEC. While this could be blamed on a shortage of staff and resources at the SEC, there were other failures too. The agency is desperately in need of more skilled personnel and Schapiro has plans to hire new personnel skilled in forensic accounting and other necessary techniques.

Since Schapiro took over the beleaguered agency two months ago, she has been working hard to accelerate the process of bringing cases forward after an investigation and has also spoken about encouraging investment fraud tips through whistleblower incentive laws. These laws could allow the SEC to attract high quality fraud tips that lead to well developed cases.

It is no secret that the SEC has faced a severe credibility crisis in recent years. What is needed is a major overhaul of the agency’s investigating processes; the measures Schapiro has introduced are a promising first step.

Investment Fraud Lawsuits

The number of investment frauds exposed in recent months has caused concerns among investors who feel let down by the SEC’S failure to protect them.  Where government agencies fail to protect investor money from scams, a securities attorney can help recover lost investments. 

If you've suffered losses in an investment fraud, contact a securities attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP for free consultation.

 

 

 

New York Investment Advisor found Guilty of Operating Ponzi Scheme

A Manhattan investment advisor has been found guilty of operating an $11 million Ponzi scheme. Hayim Regensberg was found guilty of securities and wire fraud charges, and faces up to 20 years in prison.

According to federal prosecutors, Regensberg used his investors' money to run a classic Ponzi scheme - paying off older investors with newer investors' money. Prosecutors were able to prove that Regensberg solicited investments by telling investors their funds would be invested either in foreign initial public offerings that offered returns between 5 and 15 percent, or in trading firms that would give annual returns up to 18 percent. Both investment methods, Regensberg assured investors, were extremely low risk. Investment Fraud AttorneyNeedless to say, the investments went neither into initial public offerings or trading firms. Instead, Regensberg invested in speculative investments, losing large portions of investor money in the process. Large sums of money also found their way into the hands of his relatives.

When suspicious investors demanded to know where their money was Regensberg furnished a forged bank statement showing a bank balance of $9 million in investment funds. The account actually contained the grand sum of $9,000. Overall, investors lost more than $11 million in Regensberg's Ponzi scheme.

Investment Fraud Lawyers

One of an investment advisor's duties is to inform his clients about the risks of investments. Advisors must be aware of the risks of a scheme and must be upfront about them. The investor must be comfortable with the risk factor and all investments must be made using the same methods the advisor describes. Investments must also be appropriate to the objectives of the investor, as well as his financial condition. Failure to do so can make the investment advisor liable for investment fraud.

If you have suffered losses in a Ponzi scheme, an investment fraud lawyer can help you begin the process of recovering your money. Contact a securities attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP to discuss your options for compensation.

 

 

 

The Troubles Don't End for Investment Fraud Mastermind Marcus Schrenker

Marcus Schrenker, the money manager who quite literally tried to parachute his way out of financial troubles after the investment fraud he was operating went bust, has come into more trouble since then. A judge ordered him to pay $304,000 to his investors and an additional $280,000 in fines to the state.

Schrenker is currently being held at the Escambia County Jail and faces investment fraud lawsuits filed by investors who say he caused them extreme financial loss through spurious practices like document forgery and charging investors outrageous fees.

Investment Fraud AttorneyIn March, the 38-year-old Schrenker was put through mental evaluation tests to determine whether he was competent to stand trial. Those evaluations came about as a result of Schrenker’s bizarre behavior prior to his arrest. On January 11th, Schrenker, aware that he was facing a black hole of investment fraud charges and lawsuits, got into his plane, put it on auto pilot, and parachuted out of it, leaving the aircraft to crash into an Alabama swamp. Once safely on the ground, Schrenker hopped onto a motorcycle he had earlier hidden in a storage unit and drove away. His ingenious, Bondesque escape plan was unsuccessful, however, and he was arrested two days later on Florida camping grounds.

An administrative law judge announced that Schrenker must pay restitution amounting to $304,000 to his investors and state fines for the violation of insurance rules amounting to $280,000. He already faces the prospect of having to pay out millions of dollars in other penalties and fines. The lawsuits against him include:

  • One filed by an insurance company seeking commissions amounting to $1.4 million
  • One that relates to the sale of a plane in which a judge has ordered he pay $12 million
  • Federal charges relating to the plane crash during his escape

Investment Fraud Lawsuits

Desperate times call for desperate measures, one might think of Schrenker’s fool hardy escape plans; but the fact is, his desperation is nothing compared to the devastation of investors who lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in his scheme. For these investors, recovering their funds will require months of legal battles and expert securities attorney representation.

If you have lost money in an investment fraud, contact a securities attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP to learn how to begin the process of recovering your investments.

 

 

 

$35 Million in Iowa Retirement Funds Recovered In Walsh and Greenwood Investment Fraud

Some Iowa investors whose retirement savings found its way into the pockets of Paul Greenwood and Stephen Walsh, have reason to cheer – state officials have recovered about $35 million of the retirement funds and are working to recover more from the duo's $1.3 billion investment fraud.

Iowa's Deputy Attorney General informed anxious members of the Iowa Public Employees Retirement System (IPERS) that he expects to find out how much more they can recover by the end of April. The $35 million recovered is merely a fraction of the alleged $550 million the men misappropriated from the retirement fund.  Walsh and Greenwood had a contract with the IPERS to manage their assets through the companies the two men ran, WG Trading Company LP and Westridge Capital Management Inc. The two have since been charged with securities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have also filed civil charges against the two men.

Securities AttorneyFor Greenwood and Walsh, the trouble began in February when their firms were subjected to an audit by the National Futures Association. They refused to cooperate and were suspended from the organization. Since then, the two have been the subject of several investment fraud lawsuits. According to the lawsuits filed against them by the SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, since 1996, the two have managed to misappropriate $554 million from investors and have spent at least $160 million of that on maintaining their lavish lifestyles. Greenwood's share of the spoils seem to have gone to maintain some rather odd obsessions including a collection of teddy bears and stuffed animals and a pony farm. In March, lawyers for Greenwood requested that he be paid nearly $10,000 in maintenance and upkeep expenses every month. His lawyers have since withdrawn that request, asking the judge to direct the receiver to pay whatever is needed to maintain his properties.

Investment Fraud

As investment frauds continue to turn up, it is chilling to see how cold-hearted fraudsters can be. With the same indifference as Walsh and Greenwood, Madoff ran Jewish charities into the ground with the investment fraud he masterminded and Stanford destroyed a non-profit medical initiative that provided free medical treatment in Central America. Walsh and Greenwood thought little of stealing more than $500 million of pensioners' funds, a large part of which are not recoverable due to the recession.

Investors who have lost money in a Ponzi scheme or other investment fraud can seek the help of  a securities attorney to recover their investments.

If you have lost money in an investment fraud, contact a securities attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP for a free consultation.

 

 

 

Stanford Denies Investment Fraud Charges

In his first response to investment fraud charges brought against him by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), billionaire Texas financier, Allen Stanford, has denied masterminding the $8 million fraud.

Stanford Financial FraudIt's the first formal statement we’ve heard from the man at the center of the Stanford investment scam. In the response, Stanford denies each of the allegations listed by the SEC. He also announced he will be representing himself in court due to the freezing of his assets by court-appointed receiver Ralph Janvey.

Allen Stanford stands accused of scamming investors out of billions of dollars by conducting a huge Ponzi scheme in which he sold purportedly safe certificates of deposit and promised ultra-high returns. While he has yet to be criminally charged, his chief investment officer, Laura Pendergest-Holt, remains the only person involved in the fraud to have criminal charges filed against her.

Stanford’s predicament – not having money to hire a lawyer – may seem strange, but he is not without company. His situation is similar to that faced by other investment fraudsters like Arthur Nadel. Nadel has also been forced to represent himself due to lack of funds. Bernard Madoff, on the other hand, was able to hire a lawyer using funds believed to be unrelated to the infamous Madoff investment fraud. In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that a person's right to counsel was not violated if his assets were seized, depriving him of the ability to hire a lawyer. Experts believe that with no money and no lawyer, Stanford will be less likely to avoid indictment. He will probably find that conceiving and masterminding the $8 billion Stanford financial fraud was far easier than figuring out how to free himself from the tangled web he's woven.  

Stanford Investment Fraud Attorneys

Protecting your investments after they have been involved in a securities fraud like the one Stanford operated, can be hard to do on your own. These are complex legal cases that involve thousands of other duped investors and expert attorneys. Being represented by an experienced securities attorney can help you recover lost investments.

If you have lost money in the Stanford Financial Group fraud or any other securities fraud, contact a securities attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP to discuss your options for compensation.