Texas Oil and Gas Royalty Trial Begins

An oil and gas royalty trial has begun in Texas and jurors will be asked to decide if the defendant owed the plaintiff royalties or if the plaintiffs committed fraud.

M & M Resources and Energy Land Resources filed a lawsuit against DSTJ Corp in 2006, claiming the former had not received 7 months of oil and gas royalties on an area well that was later shut down. The 21 oil and gas leases were assigned to DSTJ for a .5 percent royalty. Of those leases, four were located in a region of land owned by several residents of Jefferson County, known as Blackman Tract. DSTJ, according to court papers, conducted drilling operations at the well, which was functional from October 3rd until the time it was sealed by the Texas Railroad Commission in March 2004. Texas Oil and Gas Roylaties DisputeM & M Resources allege that DSTJ failed to pay any royalties to them despite their drilling operations and production from the Quail well. According to the lawsuit, this failure constituted a default of obligations under the contract.

In response, DSTJ filed a countersuit which alleges M & M Resources was “engaged in shady dealings”. The countersuit also alleges M & M included “improper lease provisions” in the agreement, effectively preventing DSTJ from pooling the tract. DSTJ claims it had to shutdown the well due to the fraudulent inclusion of the lease provisions.

Jurors will now have to decide whether M & M Resources' alleged fraud led to the well being shutdown or if DSTJ should pay M & M Resources oil and gas royalties for the 7 months between October 2003 and March 2004, when the well was functioning.

Oil and Gas Companies May Deny Royalties

Denying royalties can be done in a number of ways. Oil and gas companies may report production levels that are much lower than the actual figures in order to avoid paying royalties. They may also inflate post production expenses to wriggle out of having to pay royalties.

Landowners in Texas who lease their lands for drilling have very few options when they are denied the royalty payments that are rightfully theirs. That is because, in Texas there is no single authority in in charge of ensuring that landowners receiver their dues. Due to the lack of such authority, owners are often at the mercy of oil and gas companies who may delay and deny royalty payments. In such cases, owners may have no other option but to consult with an oil and gas attorney to receive the royalties due to them.

 
Continue Reading...

Alaska Oil and Gas Lease Sales are Less than Desirable

An Alaska lease sale that offered oil and gas leases on nearly 9 million acres of onshore and offshore rights received a poor response, sparking concerns about the future of the industry.

The first lease sale offered rights on 4 million acres and could garner only five bids. The second round of sales offered 5 million acres and, as of last Wednesday, no bids had been received by the state Division of Oil and Gas. Four leases were sold in the Cook Inlet Basin in southern Alaska. Alaskan New Energy LLC as well as a group of individual private investors bid a total of $110,009 for oil and gas leases on 7,685 acres in the basin. The basin holds some of the state's oldest oil fields and provides much of the natural gas used in Alaska's urban centers.

Shaky Conditions are Not Surprising

According to the Division of Oil and Gas, the poor sale of oil and gas leases is not surprising when you consider the current recession. Several companies have scaled back their exploration and drilling efforts. Alaska's Oil and Gas TroublesOil and gas company officials believe the recession is definitely impacting business. According to Kara Moriarty, the deputy director for the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, companies are being thrifty and are only looking to invest where they can get the best possible returns. Recently, Marathon Oil decided to scale back its natural gas development plans in the Cook Inlet Basin. According to officials, the company based the decision on current market conditions.

Even so, these are shaky times for the oil and gas industry in Alaska. Shell stopped operations in the Beaufort Sea and future drilling in Point Thomson is still in doubt. With Marathon putting the brakes on development, experts are questioning the future of the industry in Alaska. The oil and gas industry is looking to the state to introduce more competitive conditions to give business a push. The industry's biggest issue right now is the oil tax structure, which officials say has to be stabilized for the oil and gas sector to survive.

Utah Oil and Gas Lease Dismissal Causes Fallout in Senate

Senate Republicans blocked President Obama’s nominee for deputy Interior Secretary in a statement of opposition to interior secretary Ken Salazar's cancellation of oil and gas leases in Utah. 

David J. Hayes received 57 votes in all, less than the 60 votes needed to move to a final vote. Republicans confirmed they would vote against him to make a statement showing they were opposed to the cancellation of the Utah oil and gas leases. They explained the rejection had nothing to do with Hayes himself. Republicans, including Senator Robert F. Bennett of Utah, are united in their opposition to Hayes' nomination. They insist that the lease options for the oil and gas drilling in Utah should have gone ahead as planned. Last year, the Bush administration auctioned off leases when it was just six weeks away from vacating the White house. 

Oil and Gas Lease DisputeDemocrats promised to bring the nomination to the floor again next week when they are confident it will go through. 

Senator Bennett has been the rallying force behind the opposition to Hayes. According to the Senator, although he believes Hayes is qualified for the job, he wants the Interior Department to review its decision to cancel the oil and gas leases before he drops his objection to the nomination. 

Meanwhile, there is more trouble for Secretary Salazar over his decision to revoke the oil and gas leases. Carbon, Duchesne, and Uintah Counties filed suit against Salazar in Salt Lake City, claiming that they stand to lose millions of dollars in oil and gas royalties from his decision to revoke the lease.

In addition to the three counties, three drilling companies - Impact Energy Resources LLC, Questar Exploration & Production Company, and Peak Royalty Holdings LLC filed a separate lawsuit against Salazar. Lawyers for the drilling companies claim the secretary was misinformed, and none of the pieces of land are closer than 15.5 miles to a national park. Also, Questar is disputing claims made by environmentalists that the drilling would encroach on wild areas.

With Salazar’s office insisting he will review his decision only when his deputy is confirmed, and Republicans insisting Salazar must review the decision before Hayes is confirmed, they are stuck at a stalemate. Oil and gas attorneys have been following the confirmation proceedings with interest, and will wait to see who blinks first.

 
Continue Reading...

Appeals Court Blocks Alaska Oil and Gas Leasing Plan

A federal appeals court blocked oil and gas leases off the Coast of Alaska, throwing out leases that were granted by the Bush Administration.

According to the three judges, the Interior Department neglected to make a proper assessment of the impact drilling would have on the environment. The court halted the program until a full review is conducted. The decision gives Interior Secretary Ken Salazar time to reassess the oil and gas lease sales and determine the depth of the risk to the environment.

Oil and Gas Lease AttorneyThe Bush Administration auctioned off oil and gas leases along Alaska’s coast which, according to geological estimates, could contain up to 19 billion barrels of oil. That is more than the reserves of Mexico, Nigeria, and Kazakhstan combined.

However, native Eskimos and environmental groups insist that it would be reckless to encourage drilling in these Arctic waters without understanding the depth of the dangers posed to the natural landscape. Conservationists argue that there is a significant threat posed to marine wildlife in the region due to the possibility of oil spillage. Environmental groups and native communities support the court's decision. The American Petroleum Institute released a statement saying that the court's decision would deal a severe blow to the economy, especially during this recession.  

Earlier this year, Salazar revoked oil and gas leases granted by the Bush Administration in Utah due to environmental concerns. Since the new administration took over, Salazar has also overseen the auction of oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico.

Oil and Gas Attorney

Oil and gas leases are complex contracts negotiated by specialized lawyers called oil and gas lease attorneys. If you have questions regarding oil and gas leases or run into problems trying to negotiate an oil and gas lease, an experienced attorney can help.

Contact an oil and gas lease attorney, at Arnold & Itkin LLP for a free consultation. 

 
Continue Reading...

Haynesville Shale Oil and Gas Leases Already Boosting Louisiana Economy

It is still too early to tell whether large deposits of natural gas in the Haynesville Shale in Louisiana are really the gold rush oil and gas lease holders hope it is, but the funds brought in by hefty lease bonuses and the expectation of royalties are already giving a boost to the local economy.

The boundaries of the Haynesville Shale include potentially rich deposits in DeSoto Parish, the southern regions of Webster and Caddo Parishes, Red River Parish, and portions of east Texas. Based on preliminary testing, there is a huge amount of excitement about the drilling potential here. Experts are predicting at least 70 rigs in the shale over the next year. Oil and Gas AttorneyWith each new rig we can expect dozens of jobs to open up and increased revenue to the parishes in the form of sales tax. In addition, there are oil and gas leases and oil and gas royalty payments that will leave land owners flush with money.

The promise of greenbacks pouring in has generated tremendous excitement among locals. Landowners are using their lease bonus checks to buy cars and make down payments on homes. The buzz around the Haynesville Shale has made land owners, who were quick to sign leases for what they now feel are low payments, anxious about renegotiating their leases.  Many of these owners are now seeking the help of oil and gas lease attorneys to garner a better deal for themselves.

Oil and Gas Leases

Oklahoma-based Chesapeake Energy, which announced the discovery of the Haynesville Shale, has purchased more than 200,000 acres in Louisiana and plans to add 300,000 more acres soon. According to CEO, Aubrey McClendon, the shale could hold at least 7.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Other companies have also quickly moved in, including Petrohawk Energy Corp., Questar, Encana, and Shell Western. With more companies coming in, lease payments that were once $500 an acre are inching towards the $40,000 mark.

The oil and gas attorneys at Arnold & Itkin LLP can help you renegotiate an oil and gas lease. If you feel you had to settle for low lease payments, contact an oil and gas lease lawyer at Arnold & Itkin LLP to protect your rights. 

 
Continue Reading...

Utah Oil and Gas Lease Holders Appeal Interior Secretary's Reversal Decision

Bidders who were upset when Interior Secretary Ken Salazar reversed the decision to grant oil and gas leases near Utah's Arches and Canyonlands National Parks, are joining forces to appeal the decision.

After the Bush administration sold the leases in December, Salazar claimed the sells were rushed through. The leases are on properties near Utah's Nine Mile Canyon and two of its popular national parks; Salazar insisted that the Bureau of Land Management should not have sold the leases. Oil and Gas AttorneyThe bidders, some of whom paid high prices for the valuable leases, were, predictably, not pleased when the 77 leases were revoked back in December. Now, they are taking concrete steps to get back their lease. At least a dozen of the bidders have filed appeals with the Interior Board of Land Appeals. The Interior Secretary's office is not making the process easy for the bidders, however. Salazar's decision cannot be appealed to the board, it appears, and the Interior Secretary's office has asked the bidders to take their cases to a federal court.

The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, which opposed the grant of the lease and welcomed Salazar's decision, insists that the Bush administration rushed through to grant the leases before their time in office was up. Environmentalists hailed the decision to reverse the leases, which they claim have the potential to destroy pristine land, but the bidders are not willing to part with their leases without a fight.

Oil and Gas Royalties Disputes

Oil and gas leases are not ordinary business contracts. They differ greatly from regular business documentation and are drafted by special lawyers called oil and gas lease attorneys. These contracts include inclusion of specifics like royalty rates and water rights. Also, these contracts cover environmental issues including clean up responsibilities and removal of drilling equipment after production.

If you are involved in a dispute over oil and gas royalties and have questions about your rights, an oil and gas lease attorney can help answer your questions. Contact an oil and gas lease attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP for a free evaluation of your dispute.

 
Continue Reading...

Utah Drilling Leases Revoked to Save Precious Landscapes

After the Bush administration sold oil and gas leases near some of the nation's most majestic sights, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar reversed the decision; Utah's petrolium industry is displeased with the reversal.

According to the Deseret News, in December of 2008 the Bush administration sold 116 parcels of federal land for oil and gas drilling in Utah's Red Rock Country, one of the nation's most scenic landscapes. Environmentalists quickly filed a complaint, upon which Interior Secretary Ken Salazar directed the Bureau of Land Management to return payments for 77 parcels of land; approximately 100,000 acres. The pending payments for the 77 parcels equals approximately $6 million, which the government would have collected. Future oil and gas royalties were also at stake in the transaction.

The Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States claims the land was sold with sufficient research and can't understand why the new administration would do anything to limit Utah's economic growth, as that is against Obama's energy goals. Other petroleum representatives agree, saying the decision will have "chilling effects" on Utah's economy.

Oil & Gas Royalties

If you are in a dispute involving unpaid oil and gas royalties you should contact an experienced oil and gas attorney to discuss your options. The attorneys at Arnold & Itkin LLP have the experience and expertise to help you collect the royalties you may be entitled to.

If you have been deprived of your rightful oil and gas royalties, contact an oil and gas attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP for a free consultation.

 
Continue Reading...

Court Rules in Favor of Anadarko in Oil and Gas Royalty Case

An appeals court has ruled in favor of Texas-based oil company, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in an oil and gas royalty case that has been closely watched by the industry. Earlier, in a lower court, it was ruled that the government could not collect more than $10 billion in royalties from the company's eight oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico and the ruling still stands.

The ruling has special significance for other companies that acquired oil and gas leases between 1996 and 2000. The dispute stems from a 1995 law that was passed when the oil and gas industry was going through a crisis. In order to spur production efforts the law granted oil and gas exploration companies relief from royalties, which the lease holders are expected to pay to the federal government. However, as the industry made it through the crisis and emerged stronger with robust oil prices boosting profits, the Interior Department, which oversees leasing activities in the Gulf of Mexico, attempted to recover royalties from those oil and gas leases. Kerr McGee Corp. was one of the companies that held leases on the land; the company was later acquired by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. The company refused to pay the royalties because the 1995 law gave royalty relief to lease holders until specific production volume limits were met. The federal government refuted those arguments saying the law gave it the discretionary power to levy royalties once a minimum price range had been met. A Louisiana court ruled in favor of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and a federal appeals court agreed.

The Interior Department is considering whether to appeal the decision or to look for ways to solve the issue through Congress. It is not only Anadarko Petroleum Corporation's disappearing royalties at stake for the Department, but royalties from other companies that hold leases and may now have a precedent to avoid paying royalties. 

Oil and Gas Attorney

Negotiations for oil and gas leases are different from ordinary contracts. They involve, not only royalty payments, but also details of environmental issues, access to water resources, etc. These contracts must be clearly defined with respect to the extent and depth of drilling and other factors. This requires the expertise of a specialized oil and gas attorney who has experience drawing up such contracts.

If you have an oil and gas royalty dispute, contact an experienced oil and gas attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP for a free consultation.

 
Continue Reading...